Concur News
  • Home
  • India
  • Startup
  • Regulation
  • Interview
  • Press Release
  • Login
October 14, 2025
No Result
View All Result
Concur News

Home » Clearview AI Settlement Challenged by Objectors in Court

Clearview AI Settlement Challenged by Objectors in Court

April 25, 2025
in America, News, United States
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Clearview AI Settlement Challenged by Objectors in Court

Clearview AI Settlement Challenged by Objectors in Court

Share on LinkedinShare on Whatsapp

The legal battle over controversial use of biometric data of Clearview AI is not over yet. Although a U.S. district court recently gave final approval to a settlement agreement, some are still pushing back.

Appeal Filed After Court Approves Settlement

On April 18, two named objectors, Robert Weissman and Rick Claypool, filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. They are challenging District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman’s decision to approve a settlement that would give the plaintiffs a 23 percent stake in Clearview AI—but only if the company goes public in an IPO (initial public offering).

Although the April filings don’t detail the specific reasons for the appeal, previous objections raised during the court proceedings argue that the settlement doesn’t truly change Clearview’s behavior. In fact, it could end up rewarding plaintiffs with a share in a company they’ve accused of breaking the law.

Consent Foundation

Why the Settlement Is Controversial

The critics, including Weissman and Claypool, argue that:

  • The deal does not guarantee monetary compensation for the class members.
  • It would not stop Clearview from continuing the facial recognition practices being challenged.
  • It could “perversely” reward plaintiffs if the company’s value increases in the future.

These concerns reflect similar views expressed earlier by 23 state attorneys general who submitted an amicus brief, raising doubts about the fairness and impact of the proposed settlement.

Judge’s Statement on the Settlement Scope

In her ruling, Judge Coleman clarified that her job was to review the fairness of the settlement—not to decide whether Clearview’s facial recognition practices are legal or illegal.

What Happens Next?

If the appeal by Weissman and Claypool is rejected, the settlement would be finalized, meaning plaintiffs would move forward with their 23 percent equity share in Clearview, should the company go public. If the appeal is successful, however, the case could return to court for further review.

Clearview AI’s New Direction

While this legal process continues, Clearview AI is also undergoing leadership changes. The company appears to be shifting its focus toward facial recognition contracts with the U.S. federal government, indicating a new direction in its business strategy.

Also Read: HIPAA rule faces legal pushback from states

Tags: AIData Protection

Related Posts

FIFA Flags Risks in NSE’s Mutual Fund Platform: Data Security & Operational Concerns
India

FIFA Flags Risks in NSE’s Mutual Fund Platform: Data Security & Operational Concerns

September 8, 2025
Affordability Meets Privacy Risks in ChatGPT Go
India

Affordability Meets Privacy Risks in ChatGPT Go

September 3, 2025
Data Protection Law Amendment to RTI Act Strikes Balance with Privacy Rights: Ashwini Vaishnaw
Global

Data Protection Law Amendment to RTI Act Strikes Balance with Privacy Rights: Ashwini Vaishnaw

September 1, 2025
Raghuveer
Interview

Interview with Dr. Raghuveer Kaur, DPO at Cateina Technologies, on DPDPA, GRC, and Building Scalable Privacy Frameworks

August 29, 2025

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Chetandeep

Interview with Chetandeep S. Batra, IAPP Chapter Chair on Practical Privacy in the DPDP Era

6 months ago
Raghuveer

Interview with Dr. Raghuveer Kaur, DPO at Cateina Technologies, on DPDPA, GRC, and Building Scalable Privacy Frameworks

2 months ago
C-KYC

New Rule For C-KYC Data, OTP Needed To Share Personal Info

6 months ago
Data Safeguard Interview Concur

Interview with Dr. Damodar Sahu, Co-Founder & CGO of Data Safeguard on Data Privacy

6 months ago

BROWSE BY TOPICS

AI AI in education AI Privacy banks Children privacy Compliance Consent consent managers Cross-Border Cybercrime Cyber security Data Data breach Data leak Data privacy data privacy in education Data Protection Data security Data Violation Digital DPDP DPDPA DPDP Act EU Fines GDPR google Hack Hacked Industry Interview Law Meity penalty Personal data Press Release Privacy privacy rights RBI SPAM Tech giants Technology TRAI Training Trending

701, The Capital, BKC(E), Mumbai, India

Follow us on social media:

Categories

Categories Layout
  • Africa
  • America
  • India
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Japan
  • Business
  • Events
  • Regulation
  • Law
  • News
  • Privacy
  • Startup
  • Technology
Categories Layout
  • Apps
  • Cybercrime
  • Data
  • Data Breach
  • Data Privacy
  • Data Protection
  • Digital
  • FBI
  • Investment
  • Law
  • Privacy
  • Tech Giants
  • DPDP
  • DPDPA

Harmonize Data Compliance

Footer with Animated Button
Effortlessly align your data compliance with Concur, ensuring seamless integration and robust adherence to regulatory standards.
BOOK A DEMO
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Home
  • Demo

© 2025 Concur - consent manager

Welcome Back!

OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Business

© 2025 Concur - consent manager